Im a big fan of that type of ambition in a developer. (In sandbox mode you can play as any nation starting in 1949, I was amused to see that theyve even gotten the geography and infrastructure of Sweden roughly correct.).Battle economic challenges, unstable governments and worldwide tensions in this grand strategy experience.Same goes for the technical side, with its graphics and sound that seem to come back from the 90s.
In other words this is not a game for common gamers it consumes great amounts of time and requires absolute attentiveness. Issue208. The lack of a tutorial doesnt help and the meagre graphics dont make the game any more accessible. However, if youre looking for a deep strategy game that can give you a big challenge, try it out. Its definitely better to look elsewhere into the Paradox portfolio with better, more refined, titles as Hearts of Iron or Europa Universalis. Supreme Ruler 2020 Tech Tree Manual And SomeIt will take about an hour to get used to the interface and the controlsoptions, and there is a good manual and some good walkthrough guides. At the fast speed, let the AI take care of it and just watch the fun. Expand. There is a huge amount of greatness in this game - Id actually like to give this game a 9.5, but thats not possible, so Ill round up. There is a huge amount of greatness in this game - depth, a good user interface, lots of strategy, politics, replayability, tactical battles, strategic planning, and even global nuclear war Yes, there are some weaknesses - a big learning curve, dated graphics, so-so sound. I like the military battles side myself, so the improvements over the older Supreme Ruler games with better naval transport, and the option to fight wars as a proxy instead of declaring war on everybody, are very big features. Diplomacy has some cool new options, and a lot of the other regions (controlled by the AI) seem to have lots of things of their own going on. Im actually preferring the Sandbox to the Campaign game, but that may change - lots of gameplay and replay value in this game. The economic aspect of the game is genuinely one of the more solid features in the game. If the developers added more random events and made the game not play out the same way every single time, Im sure itd be a much better game. So overall, the AI does the same thing every time, its got its priorities in the wrong places. For example, if I invade china itll still keep most of its army idle by its capital instead of pushing me out. The AI makes terrible choices, like not accepting a peace agreement when youve occupied their whole nation pretty much and getting annexed instead. It feels Very interesting type of game, but dont expect a polished high-end product. It feels authentic and the developers have spent a huge amount of attention to detail. All the strategic and tactical decisions you might expect are yours to take - this is a game grand in scope, complex and realistic. Im a big fan of that type of ambition in a developer. In sandbox mode you can play as any nation starting in 1949, I was amused to see that theyve even gotten the geography and infrastructure of Sweden roughly correct.).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |